I recognize that most of the pictures aren't totally amazing,
and generally speaking I don't exactly have an artistic eye for things, and I know so many more people who can take ordinary things and make them extraordinary,
and well, when I look at most of my pictures, I see ordinary pictures of ordinary things. I just think I got an A because for the most part my pictures fit the technical criteria.
And that's fine. My goal is to learn to use my camera and take some good pictures.
So we're working on a new project now, and it's called "Time". And I am supposed to be showing stuff that represents time. For instance the first part of the project, I am supposed to stop motion. I am supposed to show something that is clearly moving, but is frozen in time. This one is pretty good I think.
I took a bunch of pictures of Christopher riding his bike, but while these pictures technically fit the bill, I'm not in love with them, and will probably only use one of them if I can't come up with something better.
I am having a harder with the second part of the project. We are supposed to blur motion.
I guess my problem is that after 16 years of taking pictures of active kids, (especially a couple of my boys) I have grown a disdain for blurred pictures. Blurring equals BAD.
Now I am supposed to blur stuff on purpose?
We spent some time in class trying to take blurred pictures. I guess I can see where someone with more of an artistic mind can appreciate it,
but for me photography is more about documentation. I want to capture moments. Birthdays, holidays, vacations, or even just the ordinary day to day stuff.
I do enjoy pretty or funny pictures, but I am having a hard time trying to figure out what to take a picture of where the blurring would add to the picture and not detract from.
I had a thought where I could take a picture of kids coming out of school, or crossing at the crosswalk with the crossing guard standing still, and the kids would be all blurred, so that you could tell there were kids in motion going to school or coming from, but not much else. But unfortunately I figured I'd probably encounter a few problems like badly overexposed pictures and angry parents who think I'm some sort of creeper taking pics of their kids.
A third part of the project sounds a little fun in theory, but I am having issues with it already. It's the more creative part of the project, and there's a list of cool stuff we can do with our cameras, so we'll see how those turn out. In class we did these outlines of people, but I can't turn in stuff we did in class. I could recreate it on my own, and maybe I will, I think my kids will like helping me with that.
The one thing I tried at home, and I was just messing around to see if I could figure it out, was that I tried to take a picture where my kids seemed to be in two places at once. I'm disappointed in the lack of solidity in the picture. Twin ghosts is cool enough, I guess, but I was hoping for something a little more substantial. I haven't given up on that idea yet, but we'll see. The teacher told me I will never get true solidity, but gave me tips on lighting and setting.
At any rate I am always open to suggestions on subjects that would work well with the subject of time or cool ideas of stuff to blur, etc.
